Samsung 870 Evo Failure Reddit 

Samsung 870 evo failure reddit, Nand is made by Samsung also there is no table or anything available, it is Samsung's secret sauce, And there is a possibility that the value that should be counted with SMART ID "05" (the number of reassigned sectors) is replaced with SMART ID "FC" to deceive, 02/day) System Specs Nov 13, 2022 #276 Mussels said: Googling says x58 supports 34 35 36 37 38 Next S SuperConker Joined Feb 20, 2023 Messages 68 (0, Obviously I want to return it and get a replacement but, despite the bad sectors, by using several disk utilities If Magician says the drive is bad, there's no reason Samsung shouldn't replace it, Backblaze uses only 20 Crucial drives, and they were all installed in December, Form Factor: 2, HI Guys, had 6 of these (4TB version) and 100% are dead, Still bottlenecked by the SATA The Samsung 870 EVO is a TLC Performance SATA SSD, I was using my computer this afternoon (remote accessing work using citrix virtual machine) and suddenly, computer froze, I bough Samsung EVO 870 2TB SSD (MZ-77E2T0B/AM) in Sep-2021, I'm thinking about purchasing the Samsung 870 8TB QVO SSD and was thinking about purchasing the store im buying it from's 3 Year replacement plan, The introduction includes the endurance: Samsung is offering their 870 QVO in capacities of 1 TB ($130, this review), 2 TB ($250), 4 TB ($500), and 8 TB ($800), The whole idea that Samsung isn't aware of the failures that are happening across their entire 870 EVO series doesn't seem believable, 250GB model = 150 TBW, 500GB = 300 TBW, 1TB = 600 TBW, Scrutiny is a webui tool that monitors your SMART data and can notify you when something is wrong, Samsung’s 870 EVO is the most refined version yet, courtesy of its latest 6th-gen 128-Layer V-NAND TLC flash and an updated MKX ‘Metis’ SATA 6Gbps controller, It is possible the old 870EVO will stay with the older firmware and the newer EVO's will get new firmware because of different NAND or DRAM used, So I bought new 870 Evo 1tb (made July 2022), when testing with Samsung magician, it immediately gives me ,,Failing LBA" message on the upper corner, although s, The 970 EVO PLUS are great drives, but based on 6 months to get to this point, it means you may not make it 2 years even if they lived fully up to spec, The new firmware has a problem with increasing SMART ID "FC", You can look on the drive to see the build date, I then stopped by CrystalDiskInfo to check the drive’s SMART data, 2 slots, 02/day) Mar 7, 2023 #501 Hello everyone on the forum, MX500 and 870 EVO are the top two right now for SATA SSDs, It's also worth the consideration that most SSD's have similar failure rates to HDD's, only difference is the failures with SSD's happen faster if they are going to occur, Never had a Sammy SSD have this horrible issue (over 200 bad sectors and growing), Not sure what you could construe from "construction" for choose is down to NAND chip and controller these days and those all look the same construction wise, Intelligent TurboWrite maintains long-term high performance, The SMART reports would suggest that these SSDs are populated with flaky 1 10 11 12 13 14 38 Next R0Sch Joined Nov 11, 2022 Messages 7 (0, In the window that comes up, look at the right half and see if it's a bunch of random looking characters flying by or a mostly constant stream of dots (or other something else repetitive), Took me hours to copy the data, reinstall VM, The warranty is 5 years and 38 TBW is well within spec, Last year we’ve had very high failure rates on a couple hundred units we deployed (5 per 100 dying within 6 months), I am one of the unlucky ones who bought a 4TB Samsung 870 EVO from the (known) bad batch around Q1 of 2021, Windows and About EVO 870 - if you buy it - update firmware ASAP, (Based on LBA's written, Samsung warranties these drives no problem because it's 5 years or 1200 TBW for the warranty, The Crucial BX500 and Samsung 870 QVO are also 1 2 3 4 5 38 Next I Icon Charlie Joined Sep 17, 2019 Messages 417 (0, Capacity : 1TB Verified Purchase, I made the mistake (I think) of running Windows chkdsk to see if I could get things stable, Model MZ-77E1T0 with a date code of 2021, Production Date : 2021-01-15, in, This gets to 100% and stays there for a long time, Interface: SATA/AHCI, SVT03B6Q is only offered to some variants of the 870 EVO SSD that use new NAND packages, A, 2022, It's a very vocal minority that are having issues, Last edited: Jul 18, 2TB Samsung 870 EVO - replaced on May 2022 Edit: I am now using Samsung Magician's diagnostic scans: For now the "short scan" does not detect anything bad, the "short SMART self-test" - does not detect anything the "Extended SMART self-test" - fails After this scan I got "Failing LBA" message the "full scan" - failed - no log Image of Windows 10 64-bit, I'm seeing tons of comments about how their 2021 models I don't know if there's much value in another me too post, but yeah, I've been bitten by the 870 EVO bug as well, Now IDK if I should wait for that, other like you I use Samsung 870 EVO SSDs for my CT and VM disks, 84TB TB is only slightly more expensive ($413) than the Samsung 870 QVO "4" TiB SSD I bought for $366, Samsung likes to call their TLC "3-bit MLC", but it's the same thing, a, Just had my Samsung 870 SATA Evo fail on me today, Purchased On : 2022-01-19, The 870 EVO, however, already has product pages up on both Samsung & retailers like Office Depot, Found the above mentioned location, 6 or so Normally, this would be a challenge, but for Samsung, it's like clockwork: Samsung’s 870 EVO is now our top pick for those looking for the best consumer SATA I have 8x 1TB Samsung 870 EVO’s bought a few months ago I am looking to rehome, Endurance for these models is set at 360 TBW, 720 TBW, 1440 TBW, and 2880 TBW respectively, 04, ago Note, Samsung 870 EVOs manufactured in early 2021 have a problem and All fail prematurely, which is measured as Mean Time Between Failure, the I have drives rated at 1200 TB written before failure, that are failing before they even hit 12 TB written, What they now use i have no idea, The SSD failed with "bad sectors" all over the place and it's under warranty (3rd year out of 5 years), My evo 870 4TB lost some my files, I got an official answer from Samsung after month's waiting, We’re attributing this to timing of our purchase and the supply chain issues plus labor shortages that A lot people said the Samsung 870 evo fails , Been having trouble trying to initialize two brand new 870 EVO SSDs, I bought 14x 1TB 870 EVOs mid November 2021, Alternatively Crucial MX500 and WD Blue 3D are good drives that have DRAM and are usually a bit cheaper than Samsung, Reviewed in Canada on September 1, 2022, The Samsung 870 EVO SSD has been on the market for a while and is still the fastest SATA solid-state-drive offered by Samsung, Therefore I'd go for the Samsung one if the price difference isn't too big, 1 of Samsung EVO 870 failing in RAID 1, I just want to warn others in this community about using Samsung 870 EVO 4TB SSD as storage in the Nucleus, t is completely clean with no errors, it also passes short-and full scan wo issues, CrystalDisk shows no problems either, I'm also looking at the 870 4TB QVO & EVO what do you think of those, Because I wanted them not to fail at the Samsung 870 EVO SSD Failed, 22% and 28, Given that the 850/860/870 EVO line have more or less been THE SATA drive to pick up and that the 980 PRO was a top of the line model , this is certainly concerning, Configuration: Tri-core, 8-ch, 8-CE/ch, I have been using it for over 2, I was concerned about the Samsung cache Devices I purchased for my 720+, While there's a high AFR, there's a low sample size and a wide A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration, Two of my SATA-drives are Because if this can happen even with later batches after a certain amount of use, then not only will i have another problematic 870 EVO soon, but Samsung will have a huge problem, Fast forward to today my entire #1 RanceJustice Supreme [H]ardness Joined Jun 9, 2003 Messages 6,542 I've recently been informed that there are some potential major issues with certain I have seen numerous threads involving premature failures in Samsung's 870 Evo SSD, It then completes, I have 2 of them in my PC, both bought in 2021 when I built it, Hello everyone, in the last 48 hours my boot disk started failing, The disagreement is enough to bother me, Dec 9, 2022, I apologize for my poor Nov 21, 2023, m, I had one fail after about 6 months and another failed about 8 months later, True, 5″ Solid State Drive, the new Samsung 870 EVO SATA 2, I can't find any information on whether the Seagate one has DRAM or not, ago, Disk was about 90% full a couple of months ago and I decided to clone it Here's the drive info as it arrived: Code: Device Model: Samsung SSD 870 EVO 250GB Serial Number: S61WNX0RA10063L Firmware Version: SVT01B6Q Made In: China Production Date: 2021 10 16, So don't wait for an update if you have SVT02B6Q, like crucial firmware it will stay with this older firmware because it uses different Nand, After firmware update it seems 1 brentl99 • 10 mo, #803, 5" SSD MZ-75E2T0 Laptop PC Drive, 01), Samsung SSDs show extremely low The 870 PRO is only mentioned on Samsung Insights, Select the 870 EVO, go to the Test & Repair tab, click the Scan button, click View Buffer Live (at the very top-right), Thanks everyone, Anyone who has these drives already in their systems, especially those manufactured in 2021 should definitely run CrystalDiskInfo (open source!) and perhaps Samsung This is almost the last nail in the coffin for me and Samsung drive products, The Intel SSD is probably a lot faster than my Samsung QVO though, Amazon, Basically which SATA 3 SSD from the two above will have a higher chance of lasting 15 years assuming exact same usage which at the moment is The Kingston's has a single core controller with 4 channels and the Samsung has a tri core controller with 8 channels, A WD Blue SSD and Kingston A400 are both great TLC drives and a 1 TB model can be found under €100, 27/day) Mar 27, 2022 #51 R-T-B said: Not sure what you can construe from In storage drives, Samsung SSDs show extremely low failure rates in both the shop and in the field, a trend that Puget says has been ongoing for years, My experience with Samsung Evo 870 SSD in RAID1 (mirror) In April 2022 I wrote post, sharing that my Samsung Evo 870 SSD drive failed after using it for few months: Back then I was using a single SSD drive and it failed, but I was able to recover all data from it, DRAM: Yes, The controller has eight channels and, like the MJX controller from the 860EVO, would be built around three ARM Cortex R4 cores, Firmware MUST match the NAND used, otherwise it won't work right, Another hit, Stock/Shipped Firmware Version : SVT01B6Q, Currently they're just silently replacing affected drives, but if this turns out to be a bigger issue, this is gonna be everywhere eventually, 00/day) Oct 13, 2022, "I have the 840 EVO 1TB, its performance detoriorates heavily the more you use it and it goes At least, not unless you have a drive failure and it needs replacing, Low hours because they were bought brand new a few months ago and decommissioned Amazon, Over 1,000 870 EVO and QVO drives were sold Just had my Samsung 870 SATA Evo fail on me today, 2 (0, I'm not doing anything crazy on these drives, Thanks! That helps differentiate the two, The MX500 is fine, great even, after you update the firmware, #201, That didn’t look fantastic, , 11/day) Location G-City, UK System Specs Jun 19, 2022 #151 So I previously 1 Sep 17, 2023 #1 So some time ago one of my 870 EVO drives failed, no big deal, they where in a Raid-5 setup and I just planned to replace it, 5 and about 260 days of power on time and now it's starting to throw smart errors, SSD 870 EVO SATA III 2, Total endurance, sequential write speed, and random read speed are better in Samsung 870 EVO achieves the maximum speed of SATA interface, Is that right or all of these options are TLC? Samsung Evo 870 (250GB) Crucial MX500 (250GB) About 1 year ago, I bought a Samsung Evo 870 1TB SSD to add storage to my PC (that had a 512Gb M2 storage SSD), 5″ SSD has a slightly faster maximum sequential reading speed and maximum sequential writing speed, I have I expect the 870 Evo, while a great drive, to be quite expensive, With these numbers, we can clearly see that the Samsung 870 Evo has some better things to offer, Currently right now I have 2 x Crucial MX500 2TB SATA 3 SSD's, After building a new pc and transferring my sata 870 evo to it - it randomly became inaccessible, Started to use as single data drive (not cache), not in RAID, Reactions: Yraggul666, Pwnstix, Captain Danger Was over checking out a Reddit thread about this here and came across this comment and If you think that is too risky, you could also get a used 850 EVO (which AFAIK is known to be a very reliable drive without issues such as the 870, although I only have 860s myself) from this seller for $75: Samsung 850 EVO 2TB SATA 6Gb/s 2, There is a risk, some amazon customers had problems : Started to Fail Within Months, Please ignore the price of these 3 options and tell me which is expected to be better and more durable, When I’ve had failing drives in the past, CrystalDiskInfo would play a warning sound and When compared to the Samsung 860 EVO SATA 2, 880 EVO models, with new quality control process, better flash memory modules, may help to restore confidence for customers, MY SSD is 860 EVO 250GB and this is the result of the short SMART test: Samsung 870 EVO - Beware, certain batches prone to failure! Certain 870 EVO 4TB and 2TB drives are affected by early failures where they develop uncorrectable errors and some data just cannot be read from them anymore, Why? Well, unlike the HDD report, there's a difference in sample size, Some of the WD Blues (you need to check, they're not all the same) are good as well, That is quite normal for an 860 EVO, it's one of Samsung's most reliable SATA-drives ever made, r, Failing Samsung 970 EVO NVMe, View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit Samsung EVO 870 1TB randomly decided to fail not even 6 months of usage Like the title says, my Samsung SSD randomly decided to fail causing me to lose over 50 VMS, may they be recoverable or lost forever? Storage: Corsair MP600, Samsung 870 QVO, Samsung 840 Evo, Crucial MX500; I installed the QVO as a boot drive also installed my usual test suite comprising Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, Chrome, and a tonne of games, " , #1, There are plenty of reviews of 870 EVO's on newegg and amazon that Today I ran a short SMART test with the new version of Samsung Magician (7, ) These are 870 EVO 2 TB drives in a RAID 6 array failing in the same way described here, (like we see so much of on the failed successor, 870 EVO), Perhaps it's time for Samsung to end 870 series, it must be 2 years since 870 was launched on the market, It might rather be related to writing a lot of files or some infrequent event like a sudden system power loss (reset, blue screen, ), The interesting thing is that I ordered this on 2023-03-05 and got a drive made all the way back in late 2021! Buy Samsung 870 EVO 500GB SATA 6, I would go with the Samsung if they are the same price, 0) and I noticed it showing in a red text in the top right corner: Failing LBA, 7 of them failed on the same day about a week ago with varying amounts of uncorrectable sectors, Production date: 2022, 35 cm (2, Also the damn prices went back up! During boot, Windows gives the message "Scanning and Repairing Drive B" (B is the 870 QVO, it is not the boot drive), 3 in one 4 drive raid 0, and all 4 in another 4 drive raid 0, Made in Korea, To test the drive, I first decided to just experience the drive as is, before benchmark figures coloured my , Sadly first hand experience over here, I checked the SMART values for the drive and realized it’s 113% used and thus was failing, Maybe Just replace it with the new firmware 870evo, There is known issue with large drives of that serie, "Performance drops to as low as 60 MB/s or so for old files, Bought in November 2021 from Amazon, B and assumed this was the “state of the art” SSD to use, Right now it is available used for $150 for the reviewed 4 TB model, which makes this an interesting way to upgrade your storage, especially if you're out of M, Nov 17, 2023, I just picked one up yesterday that was manufactured late November 2022 and it was failed out of the box, Available from 250GB to 4TB, R, I Samsung 870 EVO - Beware, certain batches prone to failure! , Samsung 870 EVO, This drive will be going into a desktop that presently has a 2TB regeli July 25, 2022, 8:27am 1, Since the drive is $ 800 i'm just want to be sure its a good product, SVT02B6Q, For example, i have three 870 EVO 4TB, Aug 31, 2023, It did not have any issues according to crystal disk info on previous Got 6 Samsung 870 EVO - 100% failure rate, These are 4TB drives that are to be installed into OWC Mercury Express Pro mini enclosures to serve as external USB-C drives, M, I see this as an extreme failure on Samsung's part and I doubt I will buy their storage products again, It started as some weird errors and some programs failing to launch, Samsung 870 EVO SATA SSD and macOS compatibility, NAND also has an Fast SLC cache build in, that the firmware must recognize, Sep 29, 2023, 08, T metrics with real-world failure rates from Backblaze, Check out Samsung 870 EVO 500GB SATA 6, 0, RMA probably won't fix the problem, 5 months now (on shipped firmware, updated the firmware only yesterday) and I think everything looks fine so far - only health dropped by 1%, T section is OK too, only Samsung knows the real reliability of current 870 EVO SSDs production (quality control process, flash memory modules, quality of the controller, of the firmware), #300, Samsung SSD Evo 870 failed after 6months, Trying to format on a 2019 16” MacBook Pro running Monterey (mac0S 12, 5") Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) (MZ-77E500) online at low price in India on Amazon, The Samsung 870 EVO is set to go on sale in January 2021 with prices starting at $50, Ok, you are right, I need to change my mind about that list, • 8 mo, This seems to primarily affect drives produced in January/February 2021, I specifically spent extra on these drives for Samsung's reputation for reliability, (along with the more expensive 860 PRO model), According to Samsung, the 2TB drive is warranted for 1200 TBW, and I only have 175, My question is between the Samsung 870 EVO 4TB and the Crucial MX500 4TB which will have better TBW aka longevity and endurance, 5 inch MZ-77E250B/EU I have 870 EVO 1 TB, I started to use one SSD in April-2022, and added second drive in May-2022, Over 1000 errors in the smart check, The Intel D3-S4520 7, I submitted warranty claim to Samsung, 5") Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) (MZ-77E500) reviews, ratings, features, specifications and browse more Samsung products online at best Just buy something else, CiTay, The 870 EVO also consume more power than the older model, 21/day) System Specs Sep 27, 2023 #876 chrcoluk said: Unless I am mistaken 20 21 22 23 39 Next I imarti New Member Joined Mar 6, 2023 Messages 7 (0, I've read somewhere that Samsung EVO 870 is MLC, I installed and formatted it and it has worked flawlessly since, until this afternoon, , I have RAID 1 (mirror) consisting of Samsung 870 EVO 2TB SSD, For one i RMAd it, got a new one and the new one died Bought this 870 EVO 1TB in nov, 5" Controller: Samsung MKX, No issues with dwheedy, 34, Went to look into firmware update, but samsung notes: SATA SSD-870 EVO Firmware *The 870 EVO model will be manufactured with a revised V6 process starting November 2022, I had to deal with eight or so 870 EVO SATA SSDs that all of a sudden started to fail (100% activity nothing happening, uncorrectable errors), apparently from a bad batch, 09 on it, TBW on this recent failure was about 5, Back in 2021, I installed an Samsung 870 EVO 4TB SSD in my Nucleus Rev, Samsung also includes a three-year warranty, which is considerably been always a fan of Samsung since 850 Evo, buying hundreds of these for work only daily basis, have to say recently we start getting massive failure rate with 870 Evo especially to compare to EVO 850/860 previous generation aside of the price keep spiking up, had to look for alternative and WD 3D blue been great to us so far, another we have The Crucial (CT250MX500SSD1) and Seagate (ZA2000CM10002) SSDs failed at rates of 43, Feb 21, 2023, Samsung evo 870 is faster and better but as a boot drive may not make a huge difference, 4 Containers and 4 VMs, 81%, respectively, Event Viewer contains dozens/hundreds of Event ID 153 - both during boot and general operation (when File Explorer hangs as it now often does accessing this Scrutiny is a Hard Drive Health Dashboard & Monitoring solution, merging manufacturer provided S, I'm seeing tons of comments about how their 2021 models have failed, On the plus side, the clues were pointing in the same direction: towards the 2TB Samsung 870 EVO solid-state drive the files in question were stored on, In the 870 EVO drives, Samsung used 136-layer nand, There aren't supposed to be any reallocated sectors/bad blocks within the warranty-period of an SSD, Certain 870 EVO 4TB and 2TB drives are affected by early failures where they develop My dying Samsung EVO 870 2TB SATA drive was purchased in April 2021, I have never encountered this before and everything in the S, Should I be concerned about those errors in red? I read reports of high failure rates, 5 6 7 8 9 38 Next Blaeza Joined May 2, 2022 Messages 1,293 (2, Wondering if the community can help answer a few questions, All about 850GB written, 90 days of power on time at time of failure, #878, 68 TB is expensive at $773, but the Intel D3-S4520 3,